rhtrail (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Rhtrail, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 123 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rhtrail/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 123 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Combined effect of the pro-apoptotic rhTRAIL protein and HSV-1 virus in head and neck cancer cell lines."
Article Title: Combined effect of the pro-apoptotic rhTRAIL protein and HSV-1 virus in head and neck cancer cell lines.
Journal: Scientific reports
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44888-9
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 1. rhTRAIL exposure effect alone and in combination with WT HSV-1 virus on HNSCC cell lines and the normal cell line, HaCaT. Treatment was performed with rhTRAIL at 100 ng/mL and in combination with WT HSV-1 virus at MOI 0f. 0.2 and 1.0. Cell viability analysis after 48 (A) and 72 h (B) of exposure. Results are expressed by mean percentage ± standard deviation of cell viability relative to PBS 1X (considering 100% viability). Data represent the average of three independent assays performed in triplicate. The asterisks indicate statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001) in the comparison with the experimental groups by non-normal distribution Kruskal–Wallis test.
Techniques Used: Virus, Standard Deviation, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Expression analysis of apoptosis-associated proteins in the HCB289 cell line after 24 h of exposure with rhTRAIL ligand, WT HSV-1 and in combination. (A) and (B) detection and quantification of proteins after treatment. Results are expressed as mean percentage ± standard deviation of relative expression of cleaved protein relative to control (considering 100% expression) and normalized by the portion of total protein (non- cleaved). Data represent the average of three independent assays. The asterisks indicate statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001) in the comparison with the experimental groups by one-way ANOVA. Raw blots are presented in Supplementary Data 1.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Standard Deviation, Control, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. Expression analysis of apoptosis-associated proteins in the UD-SCC-2 cell line after 24 h of exposure with rhTRAIL ligand, WT HSV-1 and in combination. (A) and (B) detection and quantification of proteins after treatment. Results are expressed as mean percentage ± standard deviation of relative expression of cleaved protein relative to control (considering 100% expression) and normalized by the portion of total protein (non- cleaved). Data represent the average of three independent assays. The asterisks indicate statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001) in the comparison with the experimental groups by one-way ANOVA. Raw blots are presented in Supplementary Data 2.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Standard Deviation, Control, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Expression analysis of apoptosis-associated proteins in the HCB289 cell line after 48 h of exposure with rhTRAIL ligand, WT HSV-1 and in combination. (A) and (B) detection and quantification of proteins after treatment. Results are expressed as mean percentage ± standard deviation of relative expression of cleaved protein relative to control (considering 100% expression) and normalized by the portion of total protein (non- cleaved). Data represent the average of two independent assays. The asterisks indicate statistical significance (*P < 0.05) in the comparison with the experimental groups by one-way ANOVA. Raw blots are presented in Supplementary Data 3.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Standard Deviation, Control, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 5. Expression analysis of apoptosis-associated proteins in the UD-SCC-2 cell line after 48 h of exposure with rhTRAIL ligand, WT HSV-1 and in combination. (A) and (B) detection and quantification of proteins after treatment. Results are expressed as mean percentage ± standard deviation of relative expression of cleaved protein relative to control (considering 100% expression) and normalized by the portion of total protein (non- cleaved). Data represent the average of two independent assays. The asterisks indicate statistical significance (*P < 0.05) in the comparison with the experimental groups by one-way ANOVA. Raw blots are presented in Supplementary Data 4.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Standard Deviation, Control, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 6. Flow cytometry apoptosis analysis after treatment with rhTRAIL ligand, WT HSV-1 and in combination. A and B) Analysis of HCB289 cell line after 24 and 48 h of treatment exposure. C and D) Analysis of UD-SCC-2 cell line after 24 and 48 h of treatment exposure. Results are expressed as mean percentage ± standard deviation of the cell death rate. Data represent the average of three independent assays. The asterisks indicate statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.001) in the comparison with the experimental groups by one-way ANOVA.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Standard Deviation, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 7. DR-5 expression analysis in the HCB289 cell line after treatment with rhTRAIL ligand, WT-HSV-1 and combination. (A) and (B) Detection and quantification of the receptor after 24 h of exposure treatment. (C) and (D) Detection and quantification of the receptor after 48 h of exposure treatment. Results are expressed as mean percentage ± standard deviation of relative expression of cleaved protein relative to control (considering 100% expression) and normalized by the protein α-tubulin. Data represent the average of two independent. Raw blots are presented in Supplementary Data 5.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Standard Deviation, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 8. DR-5 expression analysis in the UD-SCC-2 cell line after treatment with rhTRAIL ligand, WT-HSV-1 and combination. (A) and (B) Detection and quantification of the receptor after 24 h of exposure treatment. (C) and (D) Detection and quantification of the receptor after 48 h of exposure treatment. Results are expressed as mean percentage ± standard deviation of relative expression of cleaved protein relative to control (considering 100% expression) and normalized by the protein α-tubulin. Data represent the average of two independent assays. Raw blots are presented in Supplementary Data 6.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Standard Deviation, Control